IMPORTANT Remember to read the rules of the board and abide by them when posting. |
Proposed " Class Action" |
Post Reply | Page <1 234 |
Author | ||
Bigmal
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Nov 2013 Location: BRISTOL Status: Offline Points: 1480 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As the instigator of this thread I note that RL players have been drawn into the matter so it would appear that this is a matter for BOTH codes as well as other sports.
Size, strength and subs are key issues but the leading with the head is arguably the real problem. Over the years the move towards seeking contact as opposed to space has made the game more relentless in physical terms so we probably have to get back to players staying on their feet although there is separate criticism on these pages of Exeter style rolling mails. The answer for the lower leagues has to be less subs and a more open game. The professional game is another matter so are we looking at protective headgear becoming mandatory and leading with the head to be penalised? Difficult questions and complicated solutions face those in charge.
|
||
Raider999
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Location: Crawley Status: Offline Points: 4434 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I didn't say that concussions couldn't/didn't happen in training - I just suggested that as a lot of the training session will not be full contact that might explain why only 20% of concussions were attributed to training despite the time spent training being considerably longer than that playing actual matches. |
||
RAID ON
|
||
marigold
World Cup Winner Joined: 09 Apr 2019 Location: Eltham Status: Offline Points: 430 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Raider sadly I have seen concussions happen in unopposed lineout practice and touch rugby. My point was about the volume of training compared to the volume of matches played
|
||
Richard Lowther
Coaching staff Moderator Joined: 19 May 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 6529 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
The legal beagles suggest that the class action won't be succesful but that a compromise will be reached - providing the players with some financial support.
Hopefully it will result in changes and reverses to some of the current practices and laws which are seen to be the root of the issue. As Workerbee suggests one of the easiest fixes is the reduction in the number of replacements and an encouragement for players to train for longevity and not bulk up for strength. The issue I don't have a simple solution for is those players who play on after being injured, either because the injury isn't picked up or they don't feel they can come off because all the subs have been used. As I said on here and other forums my Dad had an expression " Be more like dodgems not bumper cars" meaning look for the space not the man. Unfortunately too many players these days seem to take delight in looking for the man and not the space and we have players coached out of using thier initiative.
Edited by Richard Lowther - 22 Dec 2020 at 17:41 |
||
workerbee
World Cup Winner Joined: 20 May 2009 Location: Wirral Status: Offline Points: 886 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Rugby has changed, No longer do players try to avoid the tackle but take it head on as a battle of strength and physicality, no more Phil Bennetts more Joma Lomu's . This has been caused by the professional game expecting players to be gym bunnies rather than athletes. Too much emphasis on the bony building and less on Aerobic capacity. On way to reduce this would be to have less subs which would mean players having to last 80 minutes not 50. More and more players are going into the tackler with their heads down making it impossible to tackle unless they target the ankles ,many concussion injuries are on the tackler not the tackled person. there must be a way of stopping players leading with their head.
Banning schools tackling will be the end of the game as boys will simply play football. No one will want to leave school never tackling and go into senior rugby which will be a different and more physical game. No easy answers but if these actions go ahead I can see it being the death of rugby.
|
||
Raider999
World Cup Winner Joined: 18 Jan 2013 Location: Crawley Status: Offline Points: 4434 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Probably because a lot of training isn't full contact. |
||
RAID ON
|
||
marigold
World Cup Winner Joined: 09 Apr 2019 Location: Eltham Status: Offline Points: 430 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I am amazed that considering clubs train possibly three times as long as they play that less than 20% of reported concussions happen in training. Agree sport much better at reporting it in matches , would like to believe that is the same for training but am sadly sceptical.
|
||
billesleyexile
World Cup Winner Joined: 20 Jun 2013 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 1855 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Part of that is going to be because the sport has got better at identifying and reporting it. But part of it is also going to be bigger players colliding with each other and more physicality. It's an argument for going back to two nights a week training, all players to have other jobs, and banning gyms...
|
||
keep the faith
|
||
Steve@Mose
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2761 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Some interesting stats.
|
||
kingsheathlad
World Cup Winner Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Location: Alcester Status: Online Points: 3257 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
Fortunately, I only suffered concussion once when playing in the 80's,but ended up in hospital. To this day I don't remember the game or the day. Although I was discharged the same day, I was not told anything about not playing the following week, however I had a two week holiday booked so I did not play again for four weeks, which may have been a blessing. .
Reading some of quotes by these players it is quite frightening to think they played so many games after concussion or being knocked out.
Edited by kingsheathlad - 19 Dec 2020 at 08:52 |
||
Cauliflower ear.
|
||
Steve@Mose
World Cup Winner Joined: 01 Jun 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2761 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Bigmal
World Cup Winner Joined: 17 Nov 2013 Location: BRISTOL Status: Offline Points: 1480 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have just read the story about the possibility ( probability?) of a group of ex players who intend seeking damages for medical problems allegedly caused by repeated blows to the head whilst playing.
For the avoidance of doubt I do not think it my place to comment on the specific individuals involved but clearly such action could have serious implications for those playing, refereeing, coaching and administering the game at all levels. With problems brought on by C19 will we now see further changes in the laws? With the size and physicality of players especially at the top level it seems to me that the only potential solutions are likely to involve a reduction in numbers on the park as well as in the set pieces? During lockdown I have watched a couple of games of League and noticed that high tackles are not penalised quite as rigorously as in Union. I wonder whether ex League players are suffering in the same way as Union players? |
||
Post Reply | Page <1 234 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |