Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner
Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 3750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Mar 2020 at 09:50 |
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them.
|
|
CJB1
World Cup Winner
Moseley
Joined: 25 May 2007
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1915
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Mar 2020 at 09:56 |
tigerburnie wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them. |
I presume by that you mean Quins. I know Sarries are about to go down, but they've been a London side for much of their existence. And London Irish (the clue is in the name) are soon to move back, aren't they? Wasps are lost to the capital, of course ...
Edited by CJB1 - 25 Mar 2020 at 09:57
|
"What I need is a strong drink and a peer group"
|
|
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner
Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 3750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Mar 2020 at 10:26 |
CJB1 wrote:
tigerburnie wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them. | I presume by that you mean Quins. I know Sarries are about to go down, but they've been a London side for much of their existence. And London Irish (the clue is in the name) are soon to move back, aren't they? Wasps are lost to the capital, of course ...
| I didn't include the Not Nots, nor the Sorries nor the Pests as non have been in London for a long while, I know the Irish have moved back, but as itinerant clubs I did exclude them from my thoughts.
|
|
Raider999
World Cup Winner
Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Location: Crawley
Status: Offline
Points: 4460
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Mar 2020 at 11:38 |
tigerburnie wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them. | Trouble is there are lots of alternative attractions in the capital, such as football (or there used to be) unlike in the sticks where often the rugby club is at the heart of the community.
|
RAID ON
|
|
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner
Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 3750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Mar 2020 at 14:19 |
Leicester city have a very loyal following and have had for decades and to be fair most of the "northern footy clubs are well followed. The elephant in the room is Brum, they never have had a "big" rugby club, Moseley were the only first class side there and the City and the Villa are not really huge footy clubs either(now having opened a can of worms...……….I'm off lol).If(when) Coventry get back into the Premiership, the midlands will be dominating the league again.
|
|
cobbler
World Cup Winner
Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Location: Derby
Status: Offline
Points: 493
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Mar 2020 at 18:49 |
Raider999 wrote:
tigerburnie wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them. |
Trouble is there are lots of alternative attractions in the capital, such as football (or there used to be) unlike in the sticks where often the rugby club is at the heart of the community. | I think your post should have said "alternative attractions in all big cities" (one of which is London). You are right that outside cities the rugby club is often at the heart of the community and hence able to attract much better support and sponsorship than city clubs. One only needs to look at the number of small town clubs (in all 4 regions) that dominate levels 3 to 5 to see that.
|
|
Raider999
World Cup Winner
Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Location: Crawley
Status: Offline
Points: 4460
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Mar 2020 at 21:47 |
cobbler wrote:
Raider999 wrote:
tigerburnie wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them. |
Trouble is there are lots of alternative attractions in the capital, such as football (or there used to be) unlike in the sticks where often the rugby club is at the heart of the community. |
I think your post should have said "alternative attractions in all big cities" (one of which is London). You are right that outside cities the rugby club is often at the heart of the community and hence able to attract much better support and sponsorship than city clubs. One only needs to look at the number of small town clubs (in all 4 regions) that dominate levels 3 to 5 to see that. | No I meant London, as London was specifically mentioned in TigerBurnies post. I don't think you can compare the draw of Leicester City to the combined draw of Aresenal, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Tottenham, West Ham not to mention the other Non-premier clubs.
|
RAID ON
|
|
tigerburnie
World Cup Winner
Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 3750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Mar 2020 at 22:28 |
Raider999 wrote:
cobbler wrote:
Raider999 wrote:
tigerburnie wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them. |
Trouble is there are lots of alternative attractions in the capital, such as football (or there used to be) unlike in the sticks where often the rugby club is at the heart of the community. |
I think your post should have said "alternative attractions in all big cities" (one of which is London). You are right that outside cities the rugby club is often at the heart of the community and hence able to attract much better support and sponsorship than city clubs. One only needs to look at the number of small town clubs (in all 4 regions) that dominate levels 3 to 5 to see that. |
No I meant London, as London was specifically mentioned in TigerBurnies post.
I don't think you can compare the draw of Leicester City to the combined draw of Aresenal, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Tottenham, West Ham not to mention the other Non-premier clubs. | I can when talking about a club less than 5 miles from them, but we could say there's a few clubs outside of London that have a few followers. I shall ask some of the people who have experience of both Nat2 leagues and see what they think about the perceived differences between the two.
|
|
billesleyexile
World Cup Winner
Joined: 20 Jun 2013
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1855
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Mar 2020 at 08:51 |
tigerburnie wrote:
CJB1 wrote:
tigerburnie wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them. | I presume by that you mean Quins. I know Sarries are about to go down, but they've been a London side for much of their existence. And London Irish (the clue is in the name) are soon to move back, aren't they? Wasps are lost to the capital, of course ...
| I didn't include the Not Nots, nor the Sorries nor the Pests as non have been in London for a long while, I know the Irish have moved back, but as itinerant clubs I did exclude them from my thoughts. |
I certainly hold no brief for Sarries, but having to regularly drive past their ground, in the *London Borough of Barnet* no less (and well in it too - it's on a parallel distance outside the centre of London as Hendon and Walthamstow) - I'm not sure you can say they "haven't been in London for a long time."
I'd give you they *weren't* - but the Watford days are, er, a while ago.
It would be news to the millions of Londoners that live, in London, further out than Saracens' ground for starters.
|
keep the faith
|
|
Raider999
World Cup Winner
Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Location: Crawley
Status: Offline
Points: 4460
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Mar 2020 at 09:26 |
tigerburnie wrote:
Raider999 wrote:
cobbler wrote:
Raider999 wrote:
tigerburnie wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to go back, looking at Nat 1, around half the clubs were "first class" sides that maybe come from a position of being in a stronger place both on and off the field. The other half have come from the lower ranks and are on the rise despite not having the history and previous resources behind them. Small town/village sides are doing very well in the modern game, some with huge Premiership sides just down the road taking pretty much all the fan base away. Leicester Lions and Hinckley are surrounded by Premiership and Championship sides, you could argue that London with it's millions of population and only one resident Premiership side should have far more sides higher up and better supported as they have the resources behind them. |
Trouble is there are lots of alternative attractions in the capital, such as football (or there used to be) unlike in the sticks where often the rugby club is at the heart of the community. |
I think your post should have said "alternative attractions in all big cities" (one of which is London). You are right that outside cities the rugby club is often at the heart of the community and hence able to attract much better support and sponsorship than city clubs. One only needs to look at the number of small town clubs (in all 4 regions) that dominate levels 3 to 5 to see that. |
No I meant London, as London was specifically mentioned in TigerBurnies post.
I don't think you can compare the draw of Leicester City to the combined draw of Aresenal, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Tottenham, West Ham not to mention the other Non-premier clubs. | I can when talking about a club less than 5 miles from them, but we could say there's a few clubs outside of London that have a few followers. I shall ask some of the people who have experience of both Nat2 leagues and see what they think about the perceived differences between the two. | Whilst in Yorkshire last Autumn we watched Otley v Stourbridge - small but vocal crowd watched an uninspiring game. Our general thoughts were that it was slightly slower and more attritional than the southern division. I know this was only one game, but Darth's analysis of the play-off game stats suggests the Southern league is a slightly higher standard.
|
RAID ON
|
|
greeneyed
British and Irish Lion
Joined: 06 Oct 2013
Location: Wharfedale
Status: Offline
Points: 193
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Mar 2020 at 09:46 |
A few years ago a former coach of the England national team once told me that in his opinion most of the best rugby players in the country are playing in south Lancashire and West Yorkshire. And they are all playing rugby league.
|
|
Monkey Boy
World Cup Winner
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1809
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Mar 2020 at 09:52 |
greeneyed wrote:
A few years ago a former coach of the England national team once told me that in his opinion most of the best rugby players in the country are playing in south Lancashire and West Yorkshire. And they are all playing rugby league. |
How many years ago?
|
|
Bigmal
World Cup Winner
Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Location: BRISTOL
Status: Offline
Points: 1480
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Mar 2020 at 18:23 |
I suspect that the point being made was that a significant no of skilled players in the N are playing RL and consequently the standard in the North is diluted.
Players move back and to between codes nowadays but I think that the point is a fair one.
|
|
Bigmal
World Cup Winner
Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Location: BRISTOL
Status: Offline
Points: 1480
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Mar 2020 at 18:24 |
Certainly the Hull derby this season was a whole lot better than the Sale v Sarries cup game on the same night.
|
|
BeeBumble
World Cup Winner
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Location: Caldy
Status: Offline
Points: 648
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Mar 2020 at 19:35 |
Pappashanga wrote:
I recall our promotion playoff to get into National One. Caldy fought us like tigers. We had an 18 year old Kyle Sinckler in the front row.
|
Tigers to a man; just not quite enough of 'm 😁
🐅🐅🐅 🐅🐅 🐅 🐅
🐅 🐅 🐅 🐅 🐅 🐅 🐅
|
Me? I'm just buzzin' around!
|
|