Latest Scores
Printed From: National League Rugby Discussion Forum
Category: League Rugby - www.leaguerugby.co.uk
Forum Name: National 1
Forum Description: Discuss the 14 clubs in the third level of the English game
URL: http://www.leaguerugby.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=19714
Printed Date: 20 Jun 2024 at 19:22 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Latest Scores
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Subject: Latest Scores
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:11
Replies:
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:20
Posted By: Fake_Shemp
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:22
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:26
Posted By: Fake_Shemp
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:26
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:27
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:30
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:37
Posted By: Fake_Shemp
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:42
Posted By: Steve@Mose
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:43
Half time: Moseley 14 (2t) Leeds 14 (2t)
|
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:45
Rosalyn Park 17 PARFC 19 h/t
|
Posted By: FHLH
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:53
HT Chinnor 5 Cambridge 7 HT Rams 26 Taunton 0
------------- "My father told me big men fall just as quick as little ones, if you put a sword through their hearts."
|
Posted By: Halliford
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:53
FT Hull 26-27 Esher (1-5)
|
Posted By: Steve@Mose
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 15:53
Second half underway on The Common.
|
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:02
Posted By: Fake_Shemp
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:03
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:04
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:06
Rosalyn Park 24. PARFC 31
|
Posted By: Steve@Mose
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:07
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:12
Correction of scores Rosalyn Park 24 PARFC 29
|
Posted By: Fake_Shemp
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:12
Posted By: Steve@Mose
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:15
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:15
Rosslyn Park 31. PARFC 29
|
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:26
Posted By: Fake_Shemp
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:26
Posted By: Steve@Mose
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:28
Posted By: Steve@Mose
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:35
Mose 29 Leeds 21. Bonus point try for Moseley.
|
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:35
Posted By: Steve@Mose
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:38
Full time: Moseley 29 (4t) Leeds 21 (3t)
|
Posted By: Fake_Shemp
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:40
Posted By: plymouthalbion15
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:42
Posted By: FHLH
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 16:51
FT Chinnor 17 Cambridge 19 (1-4).
------------- "My father told me big men fall just as quick as little ones, if you put a sword through their hearts."
|
Posted By: fatbear
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 21:18
A deserve victory for Cambridge today, although Chinnor will probably be kicking themselves for not taking advantage of the elements in the second half. Too often they butchered their attacking line-outs, and the Cambridge back-row achieved a tremendous number of turnovers. That is probably why they are third, and Chinnor are in the bottom third !
Indeed, it took a length of the field interception try for Chinnor to claim the losing bonus point as Cambridge strove for the try bonus point.
Before the game I thought the score would be something like 45-40 to Cambridge, but the weather made it an attritional contest !
A full review is attached for anyone interest
https://fatbearssportingdiaries.blogspot.com/2023/03/chinnor-17-19-cambridge-att-450-est.html" rel="nofollow - https://fatbearssportingdiaries.blogspot.com/2023/03/chinnor-17-19-cambridge-att-450-est.html
|
Posted By: Camquin
Date Posted: 25 Mar 2023 at 21:45
Fatbear, very fair report.
Cambridge should have scored more in the first half when we camped on your line for most of the first half, but you also squandered chances, but the rain squalls made it a difficult day to play rugby.
Do you import the weather from Siberia, especially? I cannot remember a game at yours that was not played in a gale or driving rain, or both.
I did see a perfect rainbow on the way home. See you again next year.
------------- Sweeney Delenda Est
|
Posted By: AuntyM
Date Posted: 26 Mar 2023 at 00:45
I know that it is considered poor form and not the done thing to moan about the officials, especially after tasting defeat. Therefore, it must be stated from the outset that Sale deserved the win, as once again, against the same opposition, DMPRFC's second half showing didn't cut the mustard.
However, DMPRFC didn't deserve to be short-changed by a poor referee, who was constantly 'old-manned' by Sale, who were annoyingly offside and unpunished for it all day long.
3 DMPRFC yellow cards were harsh, especially when 2 Sale players should have received the same fate.
Sour grapes and all that malarkey accepted, but Sale didn't require or deserve the leg up the they got.
(And don't get me started on the Sale try under the posts, when the Sale player slid in from 5-metres out, forgetting to keep hold of it when crossing the line. Joke.)
Anyway.
Tea-break over, back on me ed !!
|
Posted By: fatbear
Date Posted: 26 Mar 2023 at 10:38
Camquin wrote:
Fatbear, very fair report.
Cambridge should have scored more in the first half when we camped on your line for most of the first half, but you also squandered chances, but the rain squalls made it a difficult day to play rugby.
Do you import the weather from Siberia, especially? I cannot remember a game at yours that was not played in a gale or driving rain, or both.
I did see a perfect rainbow on the way home. See you again next year.
|
Camquin, yes, Chinnor would have been very happy to have been only 2 points behind at the interval given the amount of play in Chinnor's 22, and being down to 14 for the final 10 minutes of the half.
In most of my reports there is typically a mention of the Chinnor gale, but we have been lucky in that I think this was only the second time this season I have needed to shelter for a while in the covered stand at the ring-road end !
|
Posted By: Fake_Shemp
Date Posted: 27 Mar 2023 at 09:33
AuntyM wrote:
I know that it is considered poor form and not the done thing to moan about the officials, especially after tasting defeat. Therefore, it must be stated from the outset that Sale deserved the win, as once again, against the same opposition, DMPRFC's second half showing didn't cut the mustard.
However, DMPRFC didn't deserve to be short-changed by a poor referee, who was constantly 'old-manned' by Sale, who were annoyingly offside and unpunished for it all day long.
3 DMPRFC yellow cards were harsh, especially when 2 Sale players should have received the same fate.
Sour grapes and all that malarkey accepted, but Sale didn't require or deserve the leg up the they got.
(And don't get me started on the Sale try under the posts, when the Sale player slid in from 5-metres out, forgetting to keep hold of it when crossing the line. Joke.)
Anyway.
Tea-break over, back on me ed !!
| You aren't the only one with these sentiments.
Sale deserved the win – their physicality really told in the last quarter – but they definitely had the rub of the green in terms of officiating.
I thought their defensive line was persistently offside, but never penalised for this, Andy Hughes clearly went to slide in and lost the ball forward from a metre out (you can see this on the http://https://www.mowdenpark.com/teams/11810/match-centre/1-10551542/" rel="nofollow - highlights video ), and infringements for which Mowden players were sent to the sin bin were only deemed penalty offences when Sale players were deemed guilty.
It's impossible to have a feeling of sour grapes and 'what if' when the opposition were much more physical and clinical, but those simple refereeing errors are still irksome.
As well as the video, there is a http://https://www.mowdenpark.com/news/mowden-park-1035-sale-fc-2769704.html" rel="nofollow - match report on the DMP website.
|
Posted By: tigerburnie
Date Posted: 28 Mar 2023 at 13:14
There's a lot of discussion on most rugby forums about the officials and the lack of consistency, most blaming the officials and their "interpretation of the laws". I wonder if the fault lies in the vagaries of the laws in that they should be more concise and less open to said interpretation?
|
Posted By: WEvans
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2023 at 17:35
tigerburnie wrote:
There's a lot of discussion on most rugby forums about the officials and the lack of consistency, most blaming the officials and their "interpretation of the laws". I wonder if the fault lies in the vagaries of the laws in that they should be more concise and less open to said interpretation? |
Surely the laws have always been subject to interpretation on the basis that if a referee blew his whistle every time one side contravened one of the laws the game would be almost continually stopped.
Whether they could be made simpler without radically changing the game is another matter of course.
|
Posted By: tigerburnie
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2023 at 19:55
Apart from the occasional knock on, about the only time I remember a whistle being blown when I played was if someone scored, it used to work without the ref being the centre of attraction in the game.
|
Posted By: WEvans
Date Posted: 02 Apr 2023 at 17:03
Good luck with a silent referee in the game today!
|
|